CVE-2006-1354
CVE-2006-1354 is a high-severity vulnerability in Freeradius with a CVSS 2.0 base score of 7.5. It is not currently listed as actively exploited by CISA, and its EPSS exploit-prediction score is low.
Key facts
- Severity: High (CVSS 2.0 base score 7.5)
- EPSS exploit prediction: 3% (85th percentile)
- Actively exploited: Not listed in CISA KEV
- Affected product: Freeradius
- Published:
- Last modified:
Description
Unspecified vulnerability in FreeRADIUS 1.0.0 up to 1.1.0 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication or cause a denial of service (server crash) via "Insufficient input validation" in the EAP-MSCHAPv2 state machine module.
Frequently asked questions
- What is CVE-2006-1354?
- Unspecified vulnerability in FreeRADIUS 1.0.0 up to 1.1.0 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication or cause a denial of service (server crash) via "Insufficient input validation" in the EAP-MSCHAPv2 state machine module.
- How severe is CVE-2006-1354?
- CVE-2006-1354 has a CVSS 2.0 base score of 7.5, rated high severity.
- Is CVE-2006-1354 being actively exploited?
- It is not currently listed in CISA's KEV catalog. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score is 3% (85th percentile), an estimate of the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
- What products are affected by CVE-2006-1354?
- CVE-2006-1354 primarily affects Freeradius. In total, 7 product configurations (CPEs) are listed as vulnerable; see the affected-products list for the exact versions.
- How do I fix CVE-2006-1354?
- Review the linked vendor and NVD advisories for patched versions and mitigations, then upgrade or apply the recommended workaround. Given its high severity, prioritise patching exposed systems.
- When was CVE-2006-1354 published?
- CVE-2006-1354 was published on 2006-03-22 and last updated on 2026-06-16.
References
- ftp://patches.sgi.com/support/free/security/advisories/20060404-01-U.asc
- http://lists.suse.de/archive/suse-security-announce/2006-Mar/0009.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0271.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19300
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19405
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19518
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19527
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19811
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20461
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1015795
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1089
- http://www.freeradius.org/security.html
- http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200604-03.xml
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2006:060
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17171
- http://www.trustix.org/errata/2006/0020
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1016
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25352
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10156
Affected products (7)
- cpe:2.3:a:freeradius:freeradius:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:freeradius:freeradius:1.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:freeradius:freeradius:1.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:freeradius:freeradius:1.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:freeradius:freeradius:1.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:freeradius:freeradius:1.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:freeradius:freeradius:1.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
More vulnerabilities in Freeradius
- CVE-2019-11235 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): FreeRADIUS before 3.0.19 mishandles the "each participant verifies that the received scalar is within a range, and that…
- CVE-2019-11234 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): FreeRADIUS before 3.0.19 does not prevent use of reflection for authentication spoofing, aka a "Dragonblood" issue, a…
- CVE-2017-10984 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): An FR-GV-301 issue in FreeRADIUS 3.x before 3.0.15 allows "Write overflow in data2vp_wimax()" - this allows remote…
- CVE-2017-10979 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): An FR-GV-202 issue in FreeRADIUS 2.x before 2.2.10 allows "Write overflow in rad_coalesce()" - this allows remote…
- CVE-2017-9148 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): The TLS session cache in FreeRADIUS 2.1.1 through 2.1.7, 3.0.x before 3.0.14, 3.1.x before 2017-02-04, and 4.0.x before…
- CVE-2024-3596 — Critical (CVSS 9.0): RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response…