CVE-2006-2085

CVE-2006-2085 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Speedproject Speedcommander with a CVSS 2.0 base score of 5.1. It is not currently listed as actively exploited by CISA, and its EPSS exploit-prediction score is low. The underlying weakness is classified as CWE-119.

Key facts

Description

Multiple buffer overflows in (1) CxAce60.dll and (2) CxAce60u.dll in SpeedProject Squeez 5.10 Build 4460, and SpeedCommander 10.52 Build 4450 and 11.01 Build 4450, allow user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an ACE archive that contains a file with a long filename.

Frequently asked questions

What is CVE-2006-2085?
Multiple buffer overflows in (1) CxAce60.dll and (2) CxAce60u.dll in SpeedProject Squeez 5.10 Build 4460, and SpeedCommander 10.52 Build 4450 and 11.01 Build 4450, allow user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an ACE archive that contains a file with a long filename.
How severe is CVE-2006-2085?
CVE-2006-2085 has a CVSS 2.0 base score of 5.1, rated medium severity.
Is CVE-2006-2085 being actively exploited?
It is not currently listed in CISA's KEV catalog. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score is 4% (90th percentile), an estimate of the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
What products are affected by CVE-2006-2085?
CVE-2006-2085 primarily affects Speedproject Speedcommander. In total, 3 product configurations (CPEs) are listed as vulnerable; see the affected-products list for the exact versions.
How do I fix CVE-2006-2085?
Review the linked vendor and NVD advisories for patched versions and mitigations, then upgrade or apply the recommended workaround.
When was CVE-2006-2085 published?
CVE-2006-2085 was published on 2006-04-29 and last updated on 2026-06-16.

References

Affected products (3)

More vulnerabilities in Speedproject Speedcommander

All CVEs affecting Speedproject Speedcommander →

Other CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) vulnerabilities

Browse all CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) vulnerabilities →