CVE-2011-0915

CVE-2011-0915 is a critical-severity vulnerability in Ibm Lotus Domino with a CVSS 2.0 base score of 10.0. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score of 12% places it in the 96th percentile, indicating an elevated likelihood of exploitation. The underlying weakness is classified as CWE-119.

Key facts

Description

Stack-based buffer overflow in nrouter.exe in IBM Lotus Domino before 8.5.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long name parameter in a Content-Type header in a malformed Notes calendar (aka iCalendar or iCal) meeting request, aka SPR KLYH87LL23.

Frequently asked questions

What is CVE-2011-0915?
Stack-based buffer overflow in nrouter.exe in IBM Lotus Domino before 8.5.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long name parameter in a Content-Type header in a malformed Notes calendar (aka iCalendar or iCal) meeting request, aka SPR KLYH87LL23.
How severe is CVE-2011-0915?
CVE-2011-0915 has a CVSS 2.0 base score of 10.0, rated critical severity.
Is CVE-2011-0915 being actively exploited?
It is not currently listed in CISA's KEV catalog. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score is 12% (96th percentile), an estimate of the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
What products are affected by CVE-2011-0915?
CVE-2011-0915 primarily affects Ibm Lotus Domino. In total, 74 product configurations (CPEs) are listed as vulnerable; see the affected-products list for the exact versions.
How do I fix CVE-2011-0915?
Review the linked vendor and NVD advisories for patched versions and mitigations, then upgrade or apply the recommended workaround. Given its critical severity, prioritise patching exposed systems.
When was CVE-2011-0915 published?
CVE-2011-0915 was published on 2011-02-08 and last updated on 2026-06-16.

References

Affected products (74)

More vulnerabilities in Ibm Lotus Domino

All CVEs affecting Ibm Lotus Domino →

Other CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) vulnerabilities

Browse all CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) vulnerabilities →