How severe is CVE-2013-4629?

CVE-2013-4629 has a CVSS 2.0 base score of 8.5, rated high severity.

Is CVE-2013-4629 being actively exploited?

It is not currently listed in CISA's KEV catalog. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score is 1% (61st percentile), an estimate of the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.

What products are affected by CVE-2013-4629?

CVE-2013-4629 primarily affects Huawei Vp 9610. In total, 2 product configurations (CPEs) are listed as vulnerable; see the affected-products list for the exact versions.

How do I fix CVE-2013-4629?

Review the linked vendor and NVD advisories for patched versions and mitigations, then upgrade or apply the recommended workaround. Given its high severity, prioritise patching exposed systems.

When was CVE-2013-4629 published?

CVE-2013-4629 was published on 2013-06-20 and last updated on 2026-06-16.

CVE-2013-4629

CVE-2013-4629 is a high-severity vulnerability in Huawei Vp 9610 with a CVSS 2.0 base score of 8.5. It is not currently listed as actively exploited by CISA, and its EPSS exploit-prediction score is low. The underlying weakness is classified as CWE-255.

Key facts

Severity: High (CVSS 2.0 base score 8.5)
EPSS exploit prediction: 1% (61st percentile)
Actively exploited: Not listed in CISA KEV
Weakness: CWE-255
Affected product: Huawei Vp 9610
Published: 2013-06-20
Last modified: 2026-06-16

Description

The Huawei viewpoint VP9610 and VP9620 units for the Huawei Video Conference system do not update the Session ID upon successful establishment of a login session, which allows remote authenticated users to hijack sessions via an unspecified interception method.

Frequently asked questions

What is CVE-2013-4629?: The Huawei viewpoint VP9610 and VP9620 units for the Huawei Video Conference system do not update the Session ID upon successful establishment of a login session, which allows remote authenticated users to hijack sessions via an unspecified interception method.
How severe is CVE-2013-4629?: CVE-2013-4629 has a CVSS 2.0 base score of 8.5, rated high severity.
Is CVE-2013-4629 being actively exploited?: It is not currently listed in CISA's KEV catalog. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score is 1% (61st percentile), an estimate of the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
What products are affected by CVE-2013-4629?: CVE-2013-4629 primarily affects Huawei Vp 9610. In total, 2 product configurations (CPEs) are listed as vulnerable; see the affected-products list for the exact versions.
How do I fix CVE-2013-4629?: Review the linked vendor and NVD advisories for patched versions and mitigations, then upgrade or apply the recommended workaround. Given its high severity, prioritise patching exposed systems.
When was CVE-2013-4629 published?: CVE-2013-4629 was published on 2013-06-20 and last updated on 2026-06-16.

References

http://www.huawei.com/en/security/psirt/security-bulletins/security-advisories/hw-261327.htm

Affected products (2)

cpe:2.3:h:huawei:vp_9610:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:h:huawei:vp_9620:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Other CWE-255 (Credentials Management Errors) vulnerabilities

CVE-2016-0898 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): MySQL for PCF tiles 1.7.x before 1.7.10 were discovered to log the AWS access key in plaintext. These credentials were…
CVE-2015-7906 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): LOYTEC LIP-3ECTB 6.0.1, LINX-100, LVIS-3E100, and LIP-ME201 devices allow remote attackers to read a password-hash…
CVE-2015-7856 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): OpenNMS has a default password of rtc for the rtc account, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access…
CVE-2014-9736 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): GE Healthcare Centricity Clinical Archive Audit Trail Repository has a default password of initinit for the (1) SSL key…
CVE-2014-7233 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): GE Healthcare Precision THUNIS-800+ has a default password of (1) 1973 for the factory default System Utilities menu,…
CVE-2014-7232 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): GE Healthcare Discovery XR656 and XR656 G2 has a password of (1) 2getin for the insite user, (2) 4$xray for the xruser…

Browse all CWE-255 (Credentials Management Errors) vulnerabilities →