CVE-2015-0291
CVE-2015-0291 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Openssl with a CVSS 2.0 base score of 5.0. It is not currently listed as actively exploited by CISA, and its EPSS exploit-prediction score is low.
Key facts
- Severity: Medium (CVSS 2.0 base score 5.0)
- EPSS exploit prediction: 8% (94th percentile)
- Actively exploited: Not listed in CISA KEV
- Affected product: Openssl
- Published:
- Last modified:
Description
The sigalgs implementation in t1_lib.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) by using an invalid signature_algorithms extension in the ClientHello message during a renegotiation.
Frequently asked questions
- What is CVE-2015-0291?
- The sigalgs implementation in t1_lib.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) by using an invalid signature_algorithms extension in the ClientHello message during a renegotiation.
- How severe is CVE-2015-0291?
- CVE-2015-0291 has a CVSS 2.0 base score of 5.0, rated medium severity.
- Is CVE-2015-0291 being actively exploited?
- It is not currently listed in CISA's KEV catalog. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score is 8% (94th percentile), an estimate of the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
- What products are affected by CVE-2015-0291?
- CVE-2015-0291 primarily affects Openssl. In total, 4 product configurations (CPEs) are listed as vulnerable; see the affected-products list for the exact versions.
- How do I fix CVE-2015-0291?
- Review the linked vendor and NVD advisories for patched versions and mitigations, then upgrade or apply the recommended workaround.
- When was CVE-2015-0291 published?
- CVE-2015-0291 was published on 2015-03-19 and last updated on 2026-06-17.
References
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143748090628601&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050155601375&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050297101809&w=2
- http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-03-24-openssl-vulnerabilities-march-2015
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2015-2511959.html
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2016-2367955.html
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujul2015-2367936.html
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuoct2015-2367953.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/73235
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031929
- https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa92
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202338
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-412672.pdf
- https://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=76343947ada960b6269090638f5391068daee88d
- https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10110
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201503-11
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20150319.txt
Affected products (4)
- cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.2:beta1:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.2:beta2:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.2:beta3:*:*:*:*:*:*
More vulnerabilities in Openssl
- CVE-2009-3245 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): OpenSSL before 0.9.8m does not check for a NULL return value from bn_wexpand function calls in (1) crypto/bn/bn_div.c,…
- CVE-2006-3738 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): Buffer overflow in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers function in OpenSSL 0.9.7 before 0.9.7l, 0.9.8 before 0.9.8d, and earlier…
- CVE-2026-31789 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): Issue summary: Converting an excessively large OCTET STRING value to a hexadecimal string leads to a heap buffer…
- CVE-2022-2274 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): The OpenSSL 3.0.4 release introduced a serious bug in the RSA implementation for X86_64 CPUs supporting the AVX512IFMA…
- CVE-2021-3711 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt().…
- CVE-2016-6309 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): statem/statem.c in OpenSSL 1.1.0a does not consider memory-block movement after a realloc call, which allows remote…