How severe is CVE-2015-8098?

CVE-2015-8098 has a CVSS 3.x base score of 9.8, rated critical severity. It is exploitable over network with low attack complexity, requires no privileges and no user interaction. Impact on confidentiality is high, integrity high, and availability high.

Is CVE-2015-8098 being actively exploited?

It is not currently listed in CISA's KEV catalog. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score is 5% (92nd percentile), an estimate of the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.

What products are affected by CVE-2015-8098?

CVE-2015-8098 primarily affects F5 Big-ip Access Policy Manager. In total, 7 product configurations (CPEs) are listed as vulnerable; see the affected-products list for the exact versions.

How do I fix CVE-2015-8098?

Review the linked vendor and NVD advisories for patched versions and mitigations, then upgrade or apply the recommended workaround. Given its critical severity, prioritise patching exposed systems.

When was CVE-2015-8098 published?

CVE-2015-8098 was published on 2016-01-12 and last updated on 2026-06-17.

CVE-2015-8098

CVE-2015-8098 is a critical-severity vulnerability in F5 Big-ip Access Policy Manager with a CVSS 3.x base score of 9.8. It is not currently listed as actively exploited by CISA, and its EPSS exploit-prediction score is low. The underlying weakness is classified as CWE-119.

Key facts

Severity: Critical (CVSS 3.x base score 9.8)
CVSS v2: 10.0
EPSS exploit prediction: 5% (92nd percentile)
Actively exploited: Not listed in CISA KEV
Weakness: CWE-119
Affected product: F5 Big-ip Access Policy Manager
Published: 2016-01-12
Last modified: 2026-06-17

Description

F5 BIG-IP APM 11.4.1 before 11.4.1 HF9, 11.5.x before 11.5.3, and 11.6.0 before 11.6.0 HF4 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors related to processing a Citrix Remote Desktop connection through a virtual server configured with a remote desktop profile, aka an "Out-of-bounds memory vulnerability."

Frequently asked questions

What is CVE-2015-8098?: F5 BIG-IP APM 11.4.1 before 11.4.1 HF9, 11.5.x before 11.5.3, and 11.6.0 before 11.6.0 HF4 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors related to processing a Citrix Remote Desktop connection through a virtual server configured with a remote desktop profile, aka an "Out-of-bounds memory vulnerability."
How severe is CVE-2015-8098?: CVE-2015-8098 has a CVSS 3.x base score of 9.8, rated critical severity. It is exploitable over network with low attack complexity, requires no privileges and no user interaction. Impact on confidentiality is high, integrity high, and availability high.
Is CVE-2015-8098 being actively exploited?: It is not currently listed in CISA's KEV catalog. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score is 5% (92nd percentile), an estimate of the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
What products are affected by CVE-2015-8098?: CVE-2015-8098 primarily affects F5 Big-ip Access Policy Manager. In total, 7 product configurations (CPEs) are listed as vulnerable; see the affected-products list for the exact versions.
How do I fix CVE-2015-8098?: Review the linked vendor and NVD advisories for patched versions and mitigations, then upgrade or apply the recommended workaround. Given its critical severity, prioritise patching exposed systems.
When was CVE-2015-8098 published?: CVE-2015-8098 was published on 2016-01-12 and last updated on 2026-06-17.

References

Affected products (7)

cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_access_policy_manager:11.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_access_policy_manager:11.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_access_policy_manager:11.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_access_policy_manager:11.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_access_policy_manager:11.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_access_policy_manager:11.5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_access_policy_manager:11.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

More vulnerabilities in F5 Big-ip Access Policy Manager

CVE-2023-41373 — Critical (CVSS 9.9): A directory traversal vulnerability exists in the BIG-IP Configuration Utility that may allow an authenticated attacker…
CVE-2021-22987 — Critical (CVSS 9.9): On BIG-IP versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, 12.1.x…
CVE-2026-94127 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): When a BIG-IP APM access policy and an OAuth profile are configured on a virtual server, specific malicious traffic can…
CVE-2025-53521 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): When a BIG-IP APM access policy is configured on a virtual server, specific malicious traffic can lead to Remote Code…
CVE-2023-46747 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): Undisclosed requests may bypass configuration utility authentication, allowing an attacker with network access to the…
CVE-2022-1388 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): On F5 BIG-IP 16.1.x versions prior to 16.1.2.2, 15.1.x versions prior to 15.1.5.1, 14.1.x versions prior to 14.1.4.6,…

All CVEs affecting F5 Big-ip Access Policy Manager →

Other CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) vulnerabilities

CVE-2026-105285 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): A security vulnerability has been detected in Totolink A3002MU 1.0.0-B20230403.1455. This affects an unknown function…
CVE-2026-104610 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): A security vulnerability has been detected in Tenda HG7, HG9 and HG10 300001138_en_xpon. This impacts the function…
CVE-2026-101039 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): A vulnerability was identified in FAST FAC1900R 20190827_2.0.2. Affected by this issue is the function copy_msg_element…
CVE-2026-96257 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): A flaw has been found in Fast FAC1203R Gigabit Edition 2.0.4. Affected by this issue is the function copy_msg_element…
CVE-2026-94089 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): A vulnerability was determined in D-Link DIR-868L 2.01b05. This issue affects the function strcpy of the file…
CVE-2026-94003 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): A vulnerability has been found in Comfast CF-N1-S 2.6.0.1. Impacted is the function get_css_path_from_uri of the file…

Browse all CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) vulnerabilities →