How severe is CVE-2016-8803?

CVE-2016-8803 has a CVSS 3.x base score of 7.5, rated high severity. It is exploitable over local access with high attack complexity, requires low privileges and user interaction. Impact on confidentiality is high, integrity high, and availability high.

Is CVE-2016-8803 being actively exploited?

It is not currently listed in CISA's KEV catalog. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score is 0% (12th percentile), an estimate of the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.

What products are affected by CVE-2016-8803?

CVE-2016-8803 affects Huawei Fusionstorage. See the affected-products list for the exact vulnerable versions.

How do I fix CVE-2016-8803?

Review the linked vendor and NVD advisories for patched versions and mitigations, then upgrade or apply the recommended workaround. Given its high severity, prioritise patching exposed systems.

When was CVE-2016-8803 published?

CVE-2016-8803 was published on 2017-04-02 and last updated on 2026-06-17.

CVE-2016-8803

CVE-2016-8803 is a high-severity vulnerability in Huawei Fusionstorage with a CVSS 3.x base score of 7.5. It is not currently listed as actively exploited by CISA, and its EPSS exploit-prediction score is low. The underlying weakness is classified as CWE-264.

Key facts

Severity: High (CVSS 3.x base score 7.5)
CVSS v2: 4.1
EPSS exploit prediction: 0% (12th percentile)
Actively exploited: Not listed in CISA KEV
Weakness: CWE-264
Affected product: Huawei Fusionstorage
Published: 2017-04-02
Last modified: 2026-06-17

Description

The maintenance module in Huawei FusionStorage V100R003C30U1 allows attackers to create documents according to special rules to obtain the OS root privilege of FusionStorage.

Frequently asked questions

What is CVE-2016-8803?: The maintenance module in Huawei FusionStorage V100R003C30U1 allows attackers to create documents according to special rules to obtain the OS root privilege of FusionStorage.
How severe is CVE-2016-8803?: CVE-2016-8803 has a CVSS 3.x base score of 7.5, rated high severity. It is exploitable over local access with high attack complexity, requires low privileges and user interaction. Impact on confidentiality is high, integrity high, and availability high.
Is CVE-2016-8803 being actively exploited?: It is not currently listed in CISA's KEV catalog. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score is 0% (12th percentile), an estimate of the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
What products are affected by CVE-2016-8803?: CVE-2016-8803 affects Huawei Fusionstorage. See the affected-products list for the exact vulnerable versions.
How do I fix CVE-2016-8803?: Review the linked vendor and NVD advisories for patched versions and mitigations, then upgrade or apply the recommended workaround. Given its high severity, prioritise patching exposed systems.
When was CVE-2016-8803 published?: CVE-2016-8803 was published on 2017-04-02 and last updated on 2026-06-17.

References

Affected products (1)

cpe:2.3:a:huawei:fusionstorage:v100r003c30u1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Other CWE-264 (Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls) vulnerabilities

CVE-2016-8363 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): An issue was discovered in Moxa OnCell OnCellG3470A-LTE, AWK-1131A/3131A/4131A Series, AWK-3191 Series, AWK-5232/6232…
CVE-2016-7457 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): VMware vRealize Operations (aka vROps) 6.x before 6.4.0 allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges, or halt…
CVE-2015-7425 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): The Data Protection component in the VMware vSphere GUI in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Virtual Environments: Data…
CVE-2015-8267 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): The PasswordReset.Controllers.ResetController.ChangePasswordIndex method in PasswordReset.dll in Dovestones AD Self…
CVE-2015-7919 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): SearchBlox 8.3 before 8.3.1 allows remote attackers to write to the config file, and consequently cause a denial of…
CVE-2015-7071 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): The File Bookmark component in Apple OS X before 10.11.2 allows attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism for…

Browse all CWE-264 (Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls) vulnerabilities →