CVE-2017-3737
CVE-2017-3737 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Openssl with a CVSS 3.x base score of 5.9. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score of 79% places it in the 100th percentile, indicating an elevated likelihood of exploitation. The underlying weakness is classified as CWE-125.
Key facts
- Severity: Medium (CVSS 3.x base score 5.9)
- CVSS v2: 4.3
- EPSS exploit prediction: 79% (100th percentile)
- Actively exploited: Not listed in CISA KEV
- Weakness: CWE-125
- Affected product: Openssl
- Published:
- Last modified:
Description
OpenSSL 1.0.2 (starting from version 1.0.2b) introduced an "error state" mechanism. The intent was that if a fatal error occurred during a handshake then OpenSSL would move into the error state and would immediately fail if you attempted to continue the handshake. This works as designed for the explicit handshake functions (SSL_do_handshake(), SSL_accept() and SSL_connect()), however due to a bug it does not work correctly if SSL_read() or SSL_write() is called directly. In that scenario, if the handshake fails then a fatal error will be returned in the initial function call. If SSL_read()/SSL_write() is subsequently called by the application for the same SSL object then it will succeed and the data is passed without being decrypted/encrypted directly from the SSL/TLS record layer. In order to exploit this issue an application bug would have to be present that resulted in a call to SSL_read()/SSL_write() being issued after having already received a fatal error. OpenSSL version 1.0.2b-1.0.2m are affected. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2n. OpenSSL 1.1.0 is not affected.
Frequently asked questions
- What is CVE-2017-3737?
- OpenSSL 1.0.2 (starting from version 1.0.2b) introduced an "error state" mechanism. The intent was that if a fatal error occurred during a handshake then OpenSSL would move into the error state and would immediately fail if you attempted to continue the handshake. This works as designed for the explicit handshake functions (SSL_do_handshake(), SSL_accept() and SSL_connect()), however due to a bug it does not work correctly if SSL_read() or SSL_write() is called directly. In that scenario, if the handshake fails then a fatal error will be returned in the initial function call. If SSL_read()/SSL_write() is subsequently called by the application for the same SSL object then it will succeed and the data is passed without being decrypted/encrypted directly from the SSL/TLS record layer. In order to exploit this issue an application bug would have to be present that resulted in a call to SSL_read()/SSL_write() being issued after having already received a fatal error. OpenSSL version 1.0.2b-1.0.2m are affected. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2n. OpenSSL 1.1.0 is not affected.
- How severe is CVE-2017-3737?
- CVE-2017-3737 has a CVSS 3.x base score of 5.9, rated medium severity. It is exploitable over network with high attack complexity, requires no privileges and no user interaction. Impact on confidentiality is high, integrity none, and availability none.
- Is CVE-2017-3737 being actively exploited?
- It is not currently listed in CISA's KEV catalog. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score is 79% (100th percentile), an estimate of the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
- What products are affected by CVE-2017-3737?
- CVE-2017-3737 primarily affects Openssl. In total, 13 product configurations (CPEs) are listed as vulnerable; see the affected-products list for the exact versions.
- How do I fix CVE-2017-3737?
- Review the linked vendor and NVD advisories for patched versions and mitigations, then upgrade or apply the recommended workaround.
- When was CVE-2017-3737 published?
- CVE-2017-3737 was published on 2017-12-07 and last updated on 2026-06-17.
References
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102103
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039978
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0998
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2185
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2186
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2187
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-179516.pdf
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/898fb884b706aaeb283de4812340bb0bde8476dc
- https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-17:12.openssl.asc
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201712-03
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20171208-0001/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180117-0002/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180419-0002/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4065
- https://www.digitalmunition.me/2017/12/cve-2017-3737-openssl-security-bypass-vulnerability/
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20171207.txt
- https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2019-5072835.html
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2017-16
Affected products (13)
- cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.2b:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.2c:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.2d:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.2e:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.2f:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.2g:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.2h:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.2i:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.2j:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.2k:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.2l:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.2m:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
More vulnerabilities in Openssl
- CVE-2009-3245 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): OpenSSL before 0.9.8m does not check for a NULL return value from bn_wexpand function calls in (1) crypto/bn/bn_div.c,…
- CVE-2006-3738 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): Buffer overflow in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers function in OpenSSL 0.9.7 before 0.9.7l, 0.9.8 before 0.9.8d, and earlier…
- CVE-2026-31789 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): Issue summary: Converting an excessively large OCTET STRING value to a hexadecimal string leads to a heap buffer…
- CVE-2022-2274 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): The OpenSSL 3.0.4 release introduced a serious bug in the RSA implementation for X86_64 CPUs supporting the AVX512IFMA…
- CVE-2021-3711 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt().…
- CVE-2016-6309 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): statem/statem.c in OpenSSL 1.1.0a does not consider memory-block movement after a realloc call, which allows remote…
Other CWE-125 (Out-of-bounds Read) vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-24826 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): Out-of-bounds Write, Divide By Zero, NULL Pointer Dereference, Use of Uninitialized Resource, Out-of-bounds Read,…
- CVE-2024-22004 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): Due to length check, an attacker with privilege access on a Linux Nonsecure operating system can trigger a…
- CVE-2021-41556 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): sqclass.cpp in Squirrel through 2.2.5 and 3.x through 3.1 allows an out-of-bounds read (in the core interpreter) that…
- CVE-2021-21777 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the Ethernet/IP UDP handler functionality of EIP Stack Group OpENer…
- CVE-2017-14451 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): An exploitable out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in libevm (Ethereum Virtual Machine) of CPP-Ethereum. A…
- CVE-2013-0767 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): The nsSVGPathElement::GetPathLengthScale function in Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.12 and…
Browse all CWE-125 (Out-of-bounds Read) vulnerabilities →
Threat intelligence
Threat-intel indicators referencing this CVE:
- 45.84.120.3 (ipv4-addr)
- 45.232.73.84 (ipv4-addr)
- 203.192.232.180 (ipv4-addr)
- 187.110.238.50 (ipv4-addr)
- 182.93.50.90 (ipv4-addr)
- 177.53.215.134 (ipv4-addr)
- 150.95.82.21 (ipv4-addr)
- 113.164.66.10 (ipv4-addr)