CVE-2024-32324
CVE-2024-32324 is a high-severity vulnerability in Szlbt Lbt-t300-t400 Firmware with a CVSS 3.x base score of 7.8. It is not currently listed as actively exploited by CISA, and its EPSS exploit-prediction score is low. The underlying weakness is classified as CWE-120.
Key facts
- Severity: High (CVSS 3.x base score 7.8)
- EPSS exploit prediction: 0% (17th percentile)
- Actively exploited: Not listed in CISA KEV
- EU (EUVD) id: EUVD-2024-30142
- Weakness: CWE-120
- Affected product: Szlbt Lbt-t300-t400 Firmware
- Published:
- Last modified:
Description
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Shenzhen Libituo Technology Co., Ltd LBT-T300-T400 v.3.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the vpn_client_ip variable of the config_vpn_pptp function in rc program.
Frequently asked questions
- What is CVE-2024-32324?
- Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Shenzhen Libituo Technology Co., Ltd LBT-T300-T400 v.3.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the vpn_client_ip variable of the config_vpn_pptp function in rc program.
- How severe is CVE-2024-32324?
- CVE-2024-32324 has a CVSS 3.x base score of 7.8, rated high severity. It is exploitable over local access with low attack complexity, requires low privileges and no user interaction. Impact on confidentiality is high, integrity high, and availability high.
- Is CVE-2024-32324 being actively exploited?
- It is not currently listed in CISA's KEV catalog. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score is 0% (17th percentile), an estimate of the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
- What products are affected by CVE-2024-32324?
- CVE-2024-32324 affects Szlbt Lbt-t300-t400 Firmware. See the affected-products list for the exact vulnerable versions.
- How do I fix CVE-2024-32324?
- Review the linked vendor and NVD advisories for patched versions and mitigations, then upgrade or apply the recommended workaround. Given its high severity, prioritise patching exposed systems.
- Does CVE-2024-32324 have an EU (EUVD) identifier?
- Yes. CVE-2024-32324 is tracked in the ENISA EU Vulnerability Database (EUVD) as EUVD-2024-30142.
- When was CVE-2024-32324 published?
- CVE-2024-32324 was published on 2024-04-25 and last updated on 2026-06-17.
References
Affected products (1)
- cpe:2.3:o:szlbt:lbt-t300-t400_firmware:3.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
More vulnerabilities in Szlbt Lbt-t300-t400 Firmware
- CVE-2024-40535 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): Shenzhen Libituo Technology Co., Ltd LBT-T300-T400 v3.2 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the apn_name_3g…
- CVE-2025-29570 — High (CVSS 7.8): An issue in Shenzhen Libituo Technology Co., Ltd LBT-T300-T400 v3.2 allows a local attacker to escalate privileges via…
- CVE-2024-39181 — Medium (CVSS 6.5): Shenzhen Libituo Technology Co., Ltd LBT-T300-T400 v3.2 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the ApCliSsid…
- CVE-2024-40536 — Medium (CVSS 5.3): Shenzhen Libituo Technology Co., Ltd LBT-T300-T400 v3.2 were discovered to contain a stack overflow via the pin_3g_code…
All CVEs affecting Szlbt Lbt-t300-t400 Firmware →
Other CWE-120 (Classic Buffer Overflow) vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-48611 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): In DeviceId of DeviceId.java, there is a possible desync in persistence due to a missing bounds check. This could lead…
- CVE-2026-24823 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): Out-of-bounds Write, Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') vulnerability in FASTSHIFT…
- CVE-2026-24810 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') vulnerability in rethinkdb (src/cjson modules).…
- CVE-2026-24800 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): Out-of-bounds Write, Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') vulnerability in tildearrow…
- CVE-2025-9962 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): A buffer overflow vulnerability in Novakon P series allows attackers to gain root permission without prior…
- CVE-2010-10016 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): BS.Player version 2.57 (build 1051) contains a vulnerability in its playlist import functionality. When processing .m3u…
Browse all CWE-120 (Classic Buffer Overflow) vulnerabilities →