CVE-2025-46672
CVE-2025-46672 is a low-severity vulnerability in Nasa Cryptolib with a CVSS 3.x base score of 3.5. It is not currently listed as actively exploited by CISA, and its EPSS exploit-prediction score is low. The underlying weakness is classified as CWE-252.
Key facts
- Severity: Low (CVSS 3.x base score 3.5)
- EPSS exploit prediction: 0% (35th percentile)
- Actively exploited: Not listed in CISA KEV
- EU (EUVD) id: EUVD-2025-12475
- Weakness: CWE-252
- Affected product: Nasa Cryptolib
- Published:
- Last modified:
Description
NASA CryptoLib before 1.3.2 does not check the OTAR crypto function returned status, potentially leading to spacecraft hijacking.
Frequently asked questions
- What is CVE-2025-46672?
- NASA CryptoLib before 1.3.2 does not check the OTAR crypto function returned status, potentially leading to spacecraft hijacking.
- How severe is CVE-2025-46672?
- CVE-2025-46672 has a CVSS 3.x base score of 3.5, rated low severity. It is exploitable over network with high attack complexity, requires low privileges and no user interaction. Impact on confidentiality is low, integrity none, and availability none.
- Is CVE-2025-46672 being actively exploited?
- It is not currently listed in CISA's KEV catalog. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score is 0% (35th percentile), an estimate of the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
- What products are affected by CVE-2025-46672?
- CVE-2025-46672 affects Nasa Cryptolib. See the affected-products list for the exact vulnerable versions.
- How do I fix CVE-2025-46672?
- Review the linked vendor and NVD advisories for patched versions and mitigations, then upgrade or apply the recommended workaround.
- Does CVE-2025-46672 have an EU (EUVD) identifier?
- Yes. CVE-2025-46672 is tracked in the ENISA EU Vulnerability Database (EUVD) as EUVD-2025-12475.
- When was CVE-2025-46672 published?
- CVE-2025-46672 was published on 2025-04-27 and last updated on 2026-06-17.
References
- https://github.com/nasa/CryptoLib/compare/v1.3.1...v1.3.2
- https://github.com/nasa/CryptoLib/pull/360
- https://securitybynature.fr/post/hacking-cryptolib/
Affected products (1)
- cpe:2.3:a:nasa:cryptolib:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
More vulnerabilities in Nasa Cryptolib
- CVE-2025-30356 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): CryptoLib provides a software-only solution using the CCSDS Space Data Link Security Protocol - Extended Procedures…
- CVE-2025-29913 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): CryptoLib provides a software-only solution using the CCSDS Space Data Link Security Protocol - Extended Procedures…
- CVE-2025-29912 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): CryptoLib provides a software-only solution using the CCSDS Space Data Link Security Protocol - Extended Procedures…
- CVE-2025-29911 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): CryptoLib provides a software-only solution using the CCSDS Space Data Link Security Protocol - Extended Procedures…
- CVE-2025-29909 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): CryptoLib provides a software-only solution using the CCSDS Space Data Link Security Protocol - Extended Procedures…
- CVE-2025-30216 — Critical (CVSS 9.4): CryptoLib provides a software-only solution using the CCSDS Space Data Link Security Protocol - Extended Procedures…
All CVEs affecting Nasa Cryptolib →
Other CWE-252 vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-66565 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): Fiber Utils is a collection of common functions created for Fiber. In versions 2.0.0-rc.3 and below, when the system's…
- CVE-2021-38171 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): adts_decode_extradata in libavformat/adtsenc.c in FFmpeg 4.4 does not check the init_get_bits return value, which is a…
- CVE-2021-26955 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): An issue was discovered in the xcb crate through 2021-02-04 for Rust. It has a soundness violation because…
- CVE-1999-0199 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): manual/search.texi in the GNU C Library (aka glibc) before 2.2 lacks a statement about the unspecified tdelete return…
- CVE-2019-15900 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): An issue was discovered in slicer69 doas before 6.2 on certain platforms other than OpenBSD. On platforms without…
- CVE-2010-0211 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): The slap_modrdn2mods function in modrdn.c in OpenLDAP 2.4.22 does not check the return value of a call to the…