How severe is CVE-2026-32367?

CVE-2026-32367 has a CVSS 3.x base score of 9.1, rated critical severity. It is exploitable over network with low attack complexity, requires high privileges and no user interaction. Impact on confidentiality is high, integrity high, and availability high.

Is CVE-2026-32367 being actively exploited?

It is not currently listed in CISA's KEV catalog. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score is 0% (32nd percentile), an estimate of the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.

How do I fix CVE-2026-32367?

Review the linked vendor and NVD advisories for patched versions and mitigations, then upgrade or apply the recommended workaround. Given its critical severity, prioritise patching exposed systems.

Does CVE-2026-32367 have an EU (EUVD) identifier?

Yes. CVE-2026-32367 is tracked in the ENISA EU Vulnerability Database (EUVD) as EUVD-2026-11862.

When was CVE-2026-32367 published?

CVE-2026-32367 was published on 2026-03-13 and last updated on 2026-06-17.

CVE-2026-32367

CVE-2026-32367 is a critical-severity vulnerability with a CVSS 3.x base score of 9.1. It is not currently listed as actively exploited by CISA, and its EPSS exploit-prediction score is low. The underlying weakness is classified as CWE-94.

Key facts

Severity: Critical (CVSS 3.x base score 9.1)
EPSS exploit prediction: 0% (32nd percentile)
Actively exploited: Not listed in CISA KEV
EU (EUVD) id: EUVD-2026-11862
Weakness: CWE-94
Published: 2026-03-13
Last modified: 2026-06-17

Description

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Yannick Lefebvre Modal Dialog modal-dialog allows Remote Code Inclusion.This issue affects Modal Dialog: from n/a through <= 3.5.16.

Frequently asked questions

What is CVE-2026-32367?: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Yannick Lefebvre Modal Dialog modal-dialog allows Remote Code Inclusion.This issue affects Modal Dialog: from n/a through <= 3.5.16.
How severe is CVE-2026-32367?: CVE-2026-32367 has a CVSS 3.x base score of 9.1, rated critical severity. It is exploitable over network with low attack complexity, requires high privileges and no user interaction. Impact on confidentiality is high, integrity high, and availability high.
Is CVE-2026-32367 being actively exploited?: It is not currently listed in CISA's KEV catalog. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score is 0% (32nd percentile), an estimate of the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
How do I fix CVE-2026-32367?: Review the linked vendor and NVD advisories for patched versions and mitigations, then upgrade or apply the recommended workaround. Given its critical severity, prioritise patching exposed systems.
Does CVE-2026-32367 have an EU (EUVD) identifier?: Yes. CVE-2026-32367 is tracked in the ENISA EU Vulnerability Database (EUVD) as EUVD-2026-11862.
When was CVE-2026-32367 published?: CVE-2026-32367 was published on 2026-03-13 and last updated on 2026-06-17.

References

https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/modal-dialog/vulnerability/wordpress-modal-dialog-plugin-3-5-16-remote-code-execution-rce-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

Other CWE-94 (Code Injection) vulnerabilities

CVE-2026-57624 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in Blocksy Companion Pro <= 2.1.46 versions.
CVE-2026-10134 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows an attacker to read every secret available to the Langflow process, read…
CVE-2026-53576 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): Kestra is an open-source, event-driven orchestration platform. Prior to 1.0.45 and 1.3.21, the authentication filter…
CVE-2026-10561 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 has an vulnerability due to an improper isolation of Python execution combined…
CVE-2026-25470 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in ACPT ACPT (Pro) - Custom Post Types Plugin…
CVE-2026-48836 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in Easy Invoice <= 2.1.19 versions.

Browse all CWE-94 (Code Injection) vulnerabilities →