CVE-2026-5504
CVE-2026-5504 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Wolfssl with a CVSS 3.x base score of 5.3. It is not currently listed as actively exploited by CISA, and its EPSS exploit-prediction score is low. The underlying weakness is classified as CWE-354.
Key facts
- Severity: Medium (CVSS 3.x base score 5.3)
- CVSS v4: 6.3
- EPSS exploit prediction: 0% (2nd percentile)
- Actively exploited: Not listed in CISA KEV
- EU (EUVD) id: EUVD-2026-21235
- Weakness: CWE-354
- Affected product: Wolfssl
- Published:
- Last modified:
Description
A padding oracle exists in wolfSSL's PKCS7 CBC decryption that could allow an attacker to recover plaintext through repeated decryption queries with modified ciphertext. In previous versions of wolfSSL the interior padding bytes are not validated.
Frequently asked questions
- What is CVE-2026-5504?
- A padding oracle exists in wolfSSL's PKCS7 CBC decryption that could allow an attacker to recover plaintext through repeated decryption queries with modified ciphertext. In previous versions of wolfSSL the interior padding bytes are not validated.
- How severe is CVE-2026-5504?
- CVE-2026-5504 has a CVSS 3.x base score of 5.3, rated medium severity. It is exploitable over network with low attack complexity, requires no privileges and no user interaction. Impact on confidentiality is low, integrity none, and availability none.
- Is CVE-2026-5504 being actively exploited?
- It is not currently listed in CISA's KEV catalog. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score is 0% (2nd percentile), an estimate of the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
- What products are affected by CVE-2026-5504?
- CVE-2026-5504 affects Wolfssl. See the affected-products list for the exact vulnerable versions.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-5504?
- Review the linked vendor and NVD advisories for patched versions and mitigations, then upgrade or apply the recommended workaround.
- Does CVE-2026-5504 have an EU (EUVD) identifier?
- Yes. CVE-2026-5504 is tracked in the ENISA EU Vulnerability Database (EUVD) as EUVD-2026-21235.
- When was CVE-2026-5504 published?
- CVE-2026-5504 was published on 2026-04-09 and last updated on 2026-06-17.
References
Affected products (1)
- cpe:2.3:a:wolfssl:wolfssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
More vulnerabilities in Wolfssl
- CVE-2026-7531 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): Use-after-free in PQC hybrid key-share handling. This is an incomplete-fix follow-up to CVE-2026-5460 (released in…
- CVE-2026-5264 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): Heap buffer overflow in DTLS 1.3 ACK message processing. A remote attacker can send a crafted DTLS 1.3 ACK message that…
- CVE-2026-5187 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): Two potential heap out-of-bounds write locations existed in DecodeObjectId() in wolfcrypt/src/asn.c. First, a bounds…
- CVE-2026-4395 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): Heap-based buffer overflow in the KCAPI ECC code path of wc_ecc_import_x963_ex() in wolfSSL wolfcrypt allows a remote…
- CVE-2026-3849 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): Stack Buffer Overflow in wc_HpkeLabeledExtract via Oversized ECH Config. A vulnerability existed in wolfSSL 5.8.4 ECH…
- CVE-2026-3549 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): Heap Overflow in TLS 1.3 ECH parsing. An integer underflow existed in ECH extension parsing logic when calculating a…
Other CWE-354 vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-11543 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value vulnerability in Sharp Display Solutions projectors allows a attacker may…
- CVE-2024-25678 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): In LiteSpeed QUIC (LSQUIC) Library before 4.0.4, DCID validation is mishandled.
- CVE-2023-33668 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): DigiExam up to v14.0.2 lacks integrity checks for native modules, allowing attackers to access PII and takeover…
- CVE-2017-15994 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): rsync 3.1.3-development before 2017-10-24 mishandles archaic checksums, which makes it easier for remote attackers to…
- CVE-2026-49230 — Critical (CVSS 9.1): Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value vulnerability in Apache APISIX. The jwe-decrypt plugin under default…
- CVE-2026-34182 — Critical (CVSS 9.1): Issue Summary: Cryptographic Message Services (CMS) processing fails to perform sufficient input validation on the…