How severe is CVE-2026-63075?

CVE-2026-63075 has a CVSS 3.x base score of 7.5, rated high severity. It is exploitable over network with low attack complexity, requires no privileges and no user interaction. Impact on confidentiality is none, integrity none, and availability high.

Is CVE-2026-63075 being actively exploited?

It is not currently listed in CISA's KEV catalog. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score is 0% (40th percentile), an estimate of the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.

What products are affected by CVE-2026-63075?

CVE-2026-63075 affects Openssl. See the affected-products list for the exact vulnerable versions.

How do I fix CVE-2026-63075?

Review the linked vendor and NVD advisories for patched versions and mitigations, then upgrade or apply the recommended workaround. Given its high severity, prioritise patching exposed systems.

When was CVE-2026-63075 published?

CVE-2026-63075 was published on 2026-08-25 and last updated on 2026-09-11.

CVE-2026-63075

CVE-2026-63075 is a high-severity vulnerability in Openssl with a CVSS 3.x base score of 7.5. It is not currently listed as actively exploited by CISA, and its EPSS exploit-prediction score is low. The underlying weakness is classified as CWE-770.

Key facts

Severity: High (CVSS 3.x base score 7.5)
EPSS exploit prediction: 0% (40th percentile)
Actively exploited: Not listed in CISA KEV
Weakness: CWE-770
Affected product: Openssl
Published: 2026-08-25
Last modified: 2026-09-11

Description

Issue summary: When OpenSSL processes QUIC traffic from a peer that repeatedly sends ack-eliciting packets while not acknowledging ACK-only responses, the QUIC stack can retain ACK-only packet metadata for the lifetime of the connection. Impact summary: A remote peer that can complete a QUIC handshake can cause connection-scoped memory growth which may lead to Denial of Service through memory exhaustion, especially with sustained traffic or many concurrent QUIC connections. CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling Description: When the OpenSSL QUIC stack sends an ACK-only packet, there is no requirement by the QUIC protocol that the peer will acknowledge that ACK-only packet (i.e. it is itself not ack-eliciting). However, the OpenSSL implementation stores the metadata about the ACK frames regardless. In and of itself that's ok, but if a malicious peer establishes a connection, and then drives the connection such that ACK-only packets are forced from the OpenSSL implementation peer (i.e., by sending numerous PING frames), and then withholding any subsequent acks for ack-eliciting data, like legitimate data, said malicious peer can force inappropriate memory growth on the OpenSSL peer, potentially leading to a Denial of Service. The fix is to ensure that we account for the transmission of the ACK-only packet in the packet histories high and low watermark without actually storing the ACK-only packet metadata itself. FIPS impact: no The OpenSSL FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC code is outside the FIPS module boundary.

Frequently asked questions

What is CVE-2026-63075?: Issue summary: When OpenSSL processes QUIC traffic from a peer that repeatedly sends ack-eliciting packets while not acknowledging ACK-only responses, the QUIC stack can retain ACK-only packet metadata for the lifetime of the connection. Impact summary: A remote peer that can complete a QUIC handshake can cause connection-scoped memory growth which may lead to Denial of Service through memory exhaustion, especially with sustained traffic or many concurrent QUIC connections. CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling Description: When the OpenSSL QUIC stack sends an ACK-only packet, there is no requirement by the QUIC protocol that the peer will acknowledge that ACK-only packet (i.e. it is itself not ack-eliciting). However, the OpenSSL implementation stores the metadata about the ACK frames regardless. In and of itself that's ok, but if a malicious peer establishes a connection, and then drives the connection such that ACK-only packets are forced from the OpenSSL implementation peer (i.e., by sending numerous PING frames), and then withholding any subsequent acks for ack-eliciting data, like legitimate data, said malicious peer can force inappropriate memory growth on the OpenSSL peer, potentially leading to a Denial of Service. The fix is to ensure that we account for the transmission of the ACK-only packet in the packet histories high and low watermark without actually storing the ACK-only packet metadata itself. FIPS impact: no The OpenSSL FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC code is outside the FIPS module boundary.
How severe is CVE-2026-63075?: CVE-2026-63075 has a CVSS 3.x base score of 7.5, rated high severity. It is exploitable over network with low attack complexity, requires no privileges and no user interaction. Impact on confidentiality is none, integrity none, and availability high.
Is CVE-2026-63075 being actively exploited?: It is not currently listed in CISA's KEV catalog. Its EPSS exploit-prediction score is 0% (40th percentile), an estimate of the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
What products are affected by CVE-2026-63075?: CVE-2026-63075 affects Openssl. See the affected-products list for the exact vulnerable versions.
How do I fix CVE-2026-63075?: Review the linked vendor and NVD advisories for patched versions and mitigations, then upgrade or apply the recommended workaround. Given its high severity, prioritise patching exposed systems.
When was CVE-2026-63075 published?: CVE-2026-63075 was published on 2026-08-25 and last updated on 2026-09-11.

References

Affected products (1)

cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

More vulnerabilities in Openssl

CVE-2009-3245 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): OpenSSL before 0.9.8m does not check for a NULL return value from bn_wexpand function calls in (1) crypto/bn/bn_div.c,…
CVE-2006-3738 — Critical (CVSS 10.0): Buffer overflow in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers function in OpenSSL 0.9.7 before 0.9.7l, 0.9.8 before 0.9.8d, and earlier…
CVE-2026-63073 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response sender distinguished name directly as the…
CVE-2026-31789 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): Issue summary: Converting an excessively large OCTET STRING value to a hexadecimal string leads to a heap buffer…
CVE-2022-2274 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): The OpenSSL 3.0.4 release introduced a serious bug in the RSA implementation for X86_64 CPUs supporting the AVX512IFMA…
CVE-2021-3711 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt().…

All CVEs affecting Openssl →

Other CWE-770 (Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling) vulnerabilities

CVE-2026-63299 — Critical (CVSS 9.9): An authorization bypass vulnerability in LXD allows an authenticated user to bypass project-level disk and volume…
CVE-2026-82439 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): Description The DRPC server kept a map from function name to request queue and created an entry the first time…
CVE-2026-47891 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): A Spring WebFlux application that relies on the Aalto XML processor to parse XML input does not correctly enforce the…
CVE-2026-74878 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.0 use an in-memory rate limiter for TOTP brute-force protection that is not shared…
CVE-2026-31283 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): In Totara LMS v19.1.5 and before, the forgot password API does not implement rate limiting for the target email…
CVE-2020-37067 — Critical (CVSS 9.8): Filetto 1.0 FTP server contains a denial of service vulnerability in the FEAT command processing that allows attackers…

Browse all CWE-770 (Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling) vulnerabilities →

Threat intelligence

Threat-intel indicators referencing this CVE:

172.104.208.134 (ipv4-addr)